The issues: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 108:

==== At home ====

* We often barge into a child's room without knocking (even though they asked otherwise and there's no safety issue). Why is that normalised?

* Parental control software, which would often be considered spyware if used without permission for adults, is frequently used to both control children's digital activities and invade their digital privacy. Why do we find that acceptable?

==== By government ====

==== At school ====

* Schools can freely divulge anything about the child and what they say and do at school to parents. This may at times incite parents to punish their child, moving this task away from teachers to a less restricted authority. Why is that?

==== By businesses ====

Line 118:

Line 121:

* We often use [[manipulative language]] to communicate ''to'' or ''about'' children. Why is that normalised?

* We often call youth manipulative. Yet, adults are often more manipulative. Why is that normalised?

* We often use ad hominem<ref name=wp-ad-hominem">[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem]]</ref> or thought terminating cliches<ref name=wp-ttc">[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Though_terminating_cliche]]</ref>, or tone police<ref name=wp-~~ttc~~">[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing]]</ref> to avoid discussion with kids. Why is that okay?

* We often use ad hominem<ref name=wp-ad-hominem">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem</ref> or thought terminating cliches<ref name=wp-ttc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Though_terminating_cliche</ref>, or tone police<ref name=wp-ytone-police">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing</ref> to avoid discussion with kids. Why is that okay?

==== At home ====

==== By government ====

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 ==== At home ====
 * We often barge into a child's room without knocking (even though they asked otherwise and there's no safety issue). Why is that normalised?
+* Parental control software, which would often be considered spyware if used without permission for adults, is frequently used to both control children's digital activities and invade their digital privacy. Why do we find that acceptable?
 ==== By government ====
 ==== At school ====
+* Schools can freely divulge anything about the child and what they say and do at school to parents. This may at times incite parents to punish their child, moving this task away from teachers to a less restricted authority. Why is that?
 ==== By businesses ====
@@ Line 118: / Line 121: @@
 * We often use [[manipulative language]] to communicate ''to'' or ''about'' children. Why is that normalised?
 * We often call youth manipulative. Yet, adults are often more manipulative. Why is that normalised?
-* We often use ad hominem<ref name=wp-ad-hominem">[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem]]</ref> or thought terminating cliches<ref name=wp-ttc">[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Though_terminating_cliche]]</ref>, or tone police<ref name=wp-ttc">[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing]]</ref> to avoid discussion with kids. Why is that okay?
+* We often use ad hominem<ref name=wp-ad-hominem">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem</ref> or thought terminating cliches<ref name=wp-ttc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Though_terminating_cliche</ref>, or tone police<ref name=wp-ytone-police">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing</ref> to avoid discussion with kids. Why is that okay?
 ==== At home ====
 ==== By government ====

The issues: Difference between revisions

YouthLibNow (talk | contribs)